The Role of Smart Working in Mediating Participatory Altruistic Leadership, Competence, Quality knowledge in Learning Performance of Lecturers in Higher Education

Sri Handayani,Joko Sutarto Kardoyo,Dyp Sugiharto

doi:10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p346

Sri Handayani, Joko Sutarto Kardoyo + Show 1 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n5p346

Copy DOI

Abstract

This study aims to explore indicate that lecturer learning performance is an important factor for lecturers in the Civil Engineering Education Study Program. Participatory altruistic leadership styles, competence, quality knowledge, smart working are very important to be measured to explain their effects on learning performance. If the lecturer has high competence and quality knowledge and is supported by appropriate leadership, it will have an impact on smart working, which in the end will achieve learning performance. This research was conducted of lecturers of civil engineering education throughout Indonesia and a sample of 76 peoples. The research method was conducted with quantitative and data analysis using structural equation modeling (SEM). Regression coefficient result that relationship between competence with smart working, participatory altruistic with smart working and quality of knowledge with smart working were 0.80, 0.86 and 0.81. Regression coefficient result that relationship between smart woking with learning performance, participatory altruistic with learning performance, quality knowledge with smart working and competence with smart working were 0.99, 0.91, 0.88, and 0.88.

Highlights

1.1 Problem IdentificationLecturer learning performance is influenced by the ability of individuals to manage their abilities
In this research, testing of the model is carried out to find out how participatory altruistic, quality knowledge, competence and smart working with learning performance
In the structural of standard solution path diagram hybrid model analysis between variables quality knowledge and learning performance, it is known that the regression coefficient obtained is 0.91 and the t-value is 3.62 which is greater than 1.96. These results indicate that there is a significant relationship between the latent variables quality knowledge and learning performance, so this proves that hypothesis 5 is accepted

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Problem IdentificationLecturer learning performance is influenced by the ability of individuals to manage their abilities. Learning performance will affect the quality of a study program in a university. That lecturer competence becomes an important factor in learning performance for the development of quality human resources. The orientation of the lecturer and the intelligent work of the lecturer in planning, making formulations, implementing good plans that have been prepared and willing to conduct evaluations in carrying out their performance affect the quality of the study program. The leadership style possessed by leaders in universities determines whether an institution develops. The revolutionary era 4.0 that must be faced by universities had an impact on changes in the pattern of appropriate leadership styles to be implemented to support lecturer learning performance (Handayani et al, 2019). The style of participatory altruistic leadership can be a reference for university leaders.

Objectives

Discussion

Conclusion