Abstract

Aims We aimed to evaluate the roles of interleukin-6 (IL-6), PCT, and fibrinogen levels in the differential diagnosis of the patients with infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDFU) and noninfected diabetic foot ulcer (NIDFU) and to compare those with C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Methods Patients over 18 years with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus and DFU who were followed up in our hospital between 1 January 2016 and 1 January 2017 were included in the study. In addition to this patient group, patients with diabetes but without DFU were determined as the control group. Results Thirty-eight patients with IDFU, 38 patients with NIDFU, and 43 patients as the control group were included in the study. Fifty-six point three percent of the patients who participated in the study were males, and the mean age was 61.07 ± 11.04 years. WBC, ESR, CRP, IL-6, and fibrinogen levels of the cases with IDFU were determined to be significantly higher compared to the cases in NIDFU (p < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) value was highest for CRP (0.998; p < 0.001), and the best cut-off value for CRP was 28 m/L. The best cut-off values for fibrinogen, IL-6, ESR, and WBC were 480 mg/dL, 105.8 pg/mL, 31 mm/h, and 11.6 (103 μ/L), respectively. Conclusion Serum PCT levels were not found to be effective in the discrimination of IDFU and NIDFU. Serum IL-6 and fibrinogen levels seem to be two promising inflammatory markers in the discrimination of IDFU.

Highlights

  • Foot infection in diabetic patients is a gradually increasing problem, and it can cause severe sequelae [1]

  • We aimed to evaluate the roles of serum IL-6, PCT, and fibrinogen levels in the differential diagnosis both of patients with Infected diabetic foot ulcer (IDFU) and of those with noninfected diabetic foot ulcers (NIDFU) and to compare those with other commonly used inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

  • The role of various inflammatory markers like WBC, ESR, CRP, PCT, IL-6, and fibrinogen in the discrimination of IDFU was evaluated in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foot infection in diabetic patients is a gradually increasing problem, and it can cause severe sequelae [1]. The wound is colonized by many microorganisms, and they may penetrate down to the deeper tissues and bone in consequence of the spread of infection. In cases of a progression of infection, the hospitalization of the patients, surgical resection, and amputation may be required [1]. In a patient with a diabetic foot wound, first, the presence of infection should be assessed, and if present, the severity of the infection should be classified [3]. The classification systems of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) are used to determine the severity of infection [1].

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call