Abstract

Main conclusionUsing petrolatum gel as an antitranspirant on the flowers of California poppy and giant bindweed, we show that transpiration provides a large contribution to floral humidity generation.Floral humidity, an area of elevated humidity in the headspace of flowers, is believed to be produced predominantly through a combination of evaporation of liquid nectar and transpirational water loss from the flower. However, the role of transpiration in floral humidity generation has not been directly tested and is largely inferred by continued humidity production when nectar is removed from flowers. We test whether transpiration contributes to the floral humidity generation of two species previously identified to produce elevated floral humidity, Calystegia silvatica and Eschscholzia californica. Floral humidity production of flowers that underwent an antitranspirant treatment, petrolatum gel which blocks transpiration from treated tissues, is compared to flowers that did not receive such treatments. Gel treatments reduced floral humidity production to approximately a third of that produced by untreated flowers in C. silvatica, and half of that in E. californica. This confirms the previously untested inferences that transpiration has a large contribution to floral humidity generation and that this contribution may vary between species.

Highlights

  • Floral humidity, an area of elevated humidity in the headspace of the flower, has been detected in several flower species across different families (Harrap et al 2020a)

  • We demonstrate the contribution of petal transpiration to floral humidity generation in two flower species previously identified to produce elevated floral humidity

  • Best-fitting models, according to Akaike information criterion (AIC) (Table 2), indicated that application of gel had no influence on humidity production in either x or z transects

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An area of elevated humidity in the headspace of the flower (relative to the environment), has been detected in several flower species across different families (Harrap et al 2020a). Flower species have been found to vary in the intensity of floral humidity produced As part of this multimodal floral display, can influence pollinator foraging decisions. Hawkmoths (von Arx et al 2012), bumblebees (Harrap et al 2021), and flies (Nordström et al 2017) have innate preferences for flowers that produce higher floral humidity intensities when they are able to choose between flowers producing differing intensities. Floral humidity differences between flowers, regardless of whether elevated rewards are associated with higher floral humidity production or not, can aid bumblebee

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call