The Role of Fibroblasts in Skin Substitutes

Abstract

Listen

Translate article

Skin substitutes are slowly finding a position in the treatment of burns, scar reconstructions and chronic wounds. Some of the substitutes consist of extracellular matrix replacement material only, such as Integra and Alloderm; some include allogeneic cells (Dermagraft, Appligraf). The ideal skin substitute has not been developed yet, since none of the presently available products can ultimately prevent scar formation.Study of the role of autologous fibroblasts in the healing process might give further insight into the scarring process and eventually lead to improved skin substitutes.We compared wound reepithelialization of experimental wounds treated with proliferating keratinocytes and a dermal substitute with either dermal fibroblasts, adipose tissue derived fibroblasts or no fibroblasts. We also investigated the rate of keratinocyte migration of human skin equivalents cultured in vitro in the presence of dermal or adipose tissue derived fibroblasts.We reached successful wound closure in 8 days with transfer of proliferating keratinocytes on a dermal substitute seeded with dermal fibroblasts. However, the wounds treated with substitutes which contained adipose tissue derived fibroblasts or no fibroblasts at all were not closed even after 21 days.Keratinocytes seeded onto collagen lattices populated with either dermal or fat‐derived fibroblasts showed similar findings: a retarded migration and/or proliferation of keratinocytes on the collagen lattices with fat‐derived fibroblasts. The collagen lattices populated with fat‐derived fibroblasts also showed a marked contraction, up till 50% of the original area.In both models, more alpha‐smooth muscle actin positive cells were found in the fibroblast population from adipose origin.We conclude that epidermal regeneration is negatively influenced by the presence of fat‐derived fibroblasts in a dermal matrix; possibly, myofibroblasts play a role in this.