Abstract

With the increasing challenge of attaining sustainable balance in socioeconomic-ecosystem activities, the aspects of the global goals are continously being harnesed in order to ensure a sustainable interaction. As an alliance of the United Nations, the G-20 member countries have not only committed to attaining the Sustainable Development Goals 2030, the alliance body has further fostered frameworks that are targeted at advancing global economic and environmental sustainability. Within this context, the current study examined the environmental sustainability effects arising from the economic freedom prowess in the panel of the G-20 economies over the period 2000–2016. Among the sparse studies, the study employed the indices of economic freedom: freedom to trade internationally, regulation, sound money, legal framework, and property right and alongside the real income and renewable energy consumption as explanatory indicators. With the result of the difference- and two-step system GMM (generalized method of moments), the legal system and property right, sound money, freedom to international trade, and regulatory efficiency are detrimental to the panel countries’ environmental quality. Although this is likely to be untrue for countries that have advanced their climate actions and especially the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 2030, it suggests a dearth in the SDGs achievement among the developing and emerging economies. Moreover, it probably shows the depth of traditional or business-as-usual practices (such as the lack of sustainable economic and environmental practices) and the socioeconomic system that are obtainable in most of the developing and emerging economies. Thus, the study put forward tangible policies that are essential for governance and toward attaining desirable country-specific SDGs.

Highlights

  • The persistence drive toward a sustainable environment and development in spite of the dimensions of global challenges could only have yielded a relatively desirable outcome amongResponsible Editor: Ilhan Ozturk1 3 Vol.:(0123456789)Environmental Science and Pollution Research is mounting persistent pessure on the natural eclogical environment

  • These actions have resulted to a number of ecological complications such as environmental degradation, ecological degradation, and climate warming that are standing as threats to the economic growth and development globally (Alola et al 2019c; Alola and Joshua 2020; Ulucak and Khan 2020; Wang et al 2020; Adedoyin and Zakari 2020; Adedoyin et al 2021)

  • For the first time in the literature, this study explored the economic freedom attributes associated with the G-20 economies from the perspectives of sustainable development vis-à-vis sustainable income and environmental sustainability

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Environmental Science and Pollution Research is mounting persistent pessure on the natural eclogical environment These actions have resulted to a number of ecological complications such as environmental degradation, ecological degradation, and climate warming that are standing as threats to the economic growth and development globally (Alola et al 2019c; Alola and Joshua 2020; Ulucak and Khan 2020; Wang et al 2020; Adedoyin and Zakari 2020; Adedoyin et al 2021). The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis depicts the (tarde-off and/or U-shaped) relationship between economic growth and environmental degradation in such a way that an increase in the later is triggered by an increase in the former at the early stage of development until a thresshold level is attained when the association between the two variables becomes negative (Grossman and Krueger 1991; Stern 2004). The U-shaped relatiosnhip between economic output and environmental sustainabiity has been further conceptualized by augmenting the relationship with other social and economic indicators such as energy, trade, tourism, technology, health, and agriculture (Katircioğlu 2014; Shahbaz et al 2014; Apergis and Ozturk 2015; Al-mulali et al 2015; Ozturk et al 2016; Higón et al 2017; Asongu 2018; Sarkodie et al 2020; Alola and Ozturk 2021)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.