Abstract
This study questions the current consensus that chapters eight and nine of the Preface to Hooker’s Lawes were added quickly on last-minute advice from George Cranmer for polemical purposes. In contrast, this paper argues for the Preface’s rhetorical unity by suggesting Hooker had a firm command of his dispositio [layout], and that the Preface we know is the one intended. The justification is threefold. First: the article claims that on textual grounds Cranmer’s ‘An Excellent Letter’ had little to do with the Preface despite claims to the contrary; rather, that letter influenced Hooker’s Dedicatory Epistle to Archbishop Whitgift in Book V of the Lawes. To demonstrate this, we will cite five textual relationships between those two texts. Second: we explain the break between chapters seven and eight of the Preface by seeing chapter eight as a form of the classical digressio. Finally, we highlight the thematic unity of the Preface and illustrate how the eighth and ninth chapters form a rhetorical climax.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.