Abstract
A Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) label shows the minutes of physical activity required to burn off the caloric content of a particular food. This study investigated the influence of PACE labelling on liking and consumption of discretionary snack foods in a group of more health focused and less health focused consumers. Participants (n = 97) tasted and rated (i.e., liking, prospective consumption) a range of snack foods with or without a PACE label. Total sampling consumption was also measured. Participants completed a shortened version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the General Health Interest Scale questionnaire. Paired samples t-test, independent samples t-tests, a General Linear Model and Chi-Square tests were used to check for statistical significance. For more health focused participants (n = 57), the PACE label decreased only liking (p = 0.02). The PACE label was not effective in reducing liking (p = 0.49), prospective consumption (defined as the amount of the sample participants thought that they could consume) (p = 0.10) or consumption (p = 0.41) of energy-dense discretionary snack foods for less health focused individuals (n = 40). The level of participants’ physical activity did not facilitate the influence of PACE labelling on liking, consumption or prospective consumption. The PACE label was found to not be effective among less health focused individuals or the overall sample population. Therefore, the PACE label may not be an effective labelling strategy to reduce the liking or consumption of discretionary snack foods.
Highlights
According to the World Health Organisation, overweight in Caucasian populations is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 and less than 30 kg/m2 and obesity as having a BMI of greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 [1]
The results show that there was no main effect of Physical Activity Calorie Equivalent (PACE) labelling (p = 0.18), or health focus (p = 0.33) on liking, there was a significant interaction effect of PACE labelling and health focus on liking (p = 0.02)
The results show that there was no main effect of PACE labelling (p = 0.40)
Summary
According to the World Health Organisation, overweight in Caucasian populations is defined as having a body mass index (BMI) of greater than or equal to 25 kg/m2 and less than 30 kg/m2 and obesity as having a BMI of greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 [1]. In Australia, 63% of adults are currently overweight or obese and this is a 10% increase since 1995 [3]. One in four Australian children are obese or overweight [4]. In Australia in 2008, it was estimated that the cost of overweight and obesity was $58.2 billion [5]. This includes direct health costs, carer costs and productivity losses [5]. This is in contrast to an estimated figure of $21 billion in 2005 [6]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have