The response of benthic rhizopods to sediment disturbance does not support the intermediate disturbance hypothesis

Abstract

Disturbance is one of the mechanisms which counteract competitive exclusion of populations in resource‐limited communities, thereby facilitating coexistence and maintaining community species diversity. The intermediate disturbance hypothesis predicts maximum diversity at intermediate disturbance intensities and frequencies. This paper reports results of an experimental test of this hypothesis using a coastal benthic community of rhizopods (Protozoa: Rhizopoda), and experimental sediment resuspension as a simulated natural disturbance. We carried out two experiments of 5 d duration which focussed on the effects of resuspension intensity and frequency, respectively, on the abundance, species richness and on the Shannon‐Weaver diversity index of rhizopod communities in surface sediments of natural sediment cores from the coastal southern Baltic. Care was taken to adjust the experimental treatments to the natural disturbance regime in this area.Twenty‐four and 28 rhizopod species were present during the intensity and frequency experiment, respectively. Small bacterivorous rhizopods of the Vannellidae, Cochliopodidae, Paramoebidae and Rhizopoda incertae sedis dominated the communities during both experiments. Rhizopod abundance, species richness and diversity increased towards the end of the intensity experiment, but they did not show effects of disturbance intensity. Similarly, no effects of disturbance frequency were found during the frequency experiment. Our results indicate that coexistence and community diversity maintenance in benthic rhizopod communities, and probably in benthic heterotrophic protistan communities in general, may rely on different mechanisms than intermediate disturbance, such as trophic niche separation and high rates of dispersal and colonisation.