Abstract
This article reviews the theoretical papers and research studies concerning the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC), a research tool used to group psychiatric sugjects into homogenous diagnostic groups. The RDC contains specified inclusion and exclusion criteria for 25 diagnostic categories. The contributions made by the Feighner and Spitzer groups in the field of diagnostic reliability and validity are briefly outlined. The development of the RDC and studies regarding its reliability and validity are presented and discussed. A review of the reliability studies, which basically employed an interrater design, indicated that the RDC is a relatively reliable diagnostic tool, obtaining interrater kappa coefficients which are consistently higher than those obtained, for similar categories, in studies using other diagnostic systems such as the DSM-II. Very few studies, however, directly investigated the validity of the RDC. Its assumed validity is dependent on the findings from studies which used similar diagnostic criteria. It was suggested that more studies would be required to establish the validity of the RDC. Several limitations of the RDC were pointed out. Included among these were: its use of an exclusion method to determine diagnostic criteria, the difficulty and great amount of time required for its use, and the fact that it has so far been used only with adult inpatients. Despite its limitations, it was concluded that the RDC remains one of the best tools available to a researcher who wishes to group psychiatric patients into homogenous groups, and that the clinician could advantageously use it in his clinical practice.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call