Abstract
More than 52.4% of people with a lower extremity amputation (PLEA) will fall at least once each year. Previously established standardized scales that evaluate a concern for falling (CFF) were developed primarily among community-dwelling older adults. The reliability of commonly used scales to evaluate a CFF among PLEA is needed. To evaluate test-retest relative and absolute reliability, and agreement of the Modified Survey of Activities and Fear of Falling in the Elderly (mSAFFE), Falls Efficacy Scale - International (FES-I), Consequences of Falling (COF) Scale, Perceived Control Over Falling (PCOF) Scale, and Perceived Ability to Manage Falls (PAMF) Scale among PLEA. Web-based cross-sectional repeated-measures study. Rehabilitation hospital. Adults with a transtibial or transfemoral level amputation, who had completed a prosthetic rehabilitation program, and at minimum of 1 year using a prosthesis for ambulation were recruited after regularly scheduled appointments (N = 22, mean age ± SD, 63.5 ± 12.9 years). Not applicable. Initial and re-test scores on the mSAFFE, FES-I, COF, PCOF, and PAMF. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) demonstrated excellent relative reliability of the mSAFFE (ICC=0.92, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-0.97), good relative reliability of the FES-I (ICC=0.87, 95% CI: 0.70-0.94), and fair relative reliability of the COF (ICC=0.78, 95% CI: 0.53-0.90) and PAMF (ICC=0.73, 95% CI: 0.46-0.88) scales. The ICC value of the PCOF scale could not be validly calculated and was not further analyzed. Calculated standard error of measurement values for the mSAFFE, FES-I, COF, and PAMF scales were small in magnitude, and Bland-Altman graphs demonstrated good agreement of initial and re-test scores for all scales. This study provides initial evidence on the suitability and reliable use of the mSAFFE, FES-I, COF, and PAMF scales within this population. Further evaluation of the validity of these scales is needed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.