The Relationship between Welfare and Work Motivation with the Work Productivity of Family Planning Extension Workers in the Administrative City of East Jakarta

Abstract

The formulation of the problem in formulation of the problem in the research is how much the relationship between welfare and work motivation partially and simultaneously with work productivity at the Family Planning Office of the East Jakarta City Administration. This research aims to determine and examine the relationship between welfare and work motivation partially and simultaneously with work productivity at the East Jakarta City Administration Family Planning Office. The research method uses a survey with a quantitative approach that is correlational with a sampling technique that is saturated sampling, namely a sample research technique when all members of the population are used as samples, another term for saturated samples is all, where all members of the population are used as samples. In this study, the number of samples was 110 respondents. The variables studied are welfare (X1) and work motivation (X2 ) as independent variables, while work productivity is the dependent variable (Y). Based on the results of the research that has been carried out, it can be concluded that from the results of the discussion and research, namely: a) The results of the hypothesis test for the welfare variable and work productivity obtained a correlation coefficient value of 0.796. Meanwhile, the coefficient of determination is r 2 = 0.634, meaning that 63.4% of work productivity is determined by welfare, and the remaining 36.6% is determined by other factors. This means that the Ha hypothesis is accepted, namely that there is a strong and significant positive relationship between welfare and work productivity. b) The results of the hypothesis test for the work motivation variable and work productivity obtained a correlation coefficient of 0.765. Meanwhile, the coefficient of determination is r 2 = 0.586, meaning that 58.6% of work productivity is determined by work motivation, and the remaining 41.4% is determined by other factors, this means that the Ha hypothesis is accepted, namely that there is a strong and significant positive relationship between work motivation and work productivity. . c) To test the hypothesis of a double correlation between the variables of well-being and work motivation together with work productivity, a correlation coefficient value of 0.828 was obtained. Meanwhile, the coefficient of determination is R 2 = 0.686, meaning that together, work productivity is 68.6% determined by welfare and work motivation, and the remaining 31.4% is determined by other factors, this means the Ha hypothesis is accepted, namely, there is a very strong relationship and significant relationship between well-being and work motivation together with work productivity.