Abstract
By using the data of 31615 famer from 757 administrative villages within 7 provinces in the minority regions of the Midwest, we found that the administrative expenditure has a significant positive impact on the rural residents’ income gap. Meanwhile, fiscal expenditures on agriculture, science, education, culture, public health, and the degree of democratic development have a significant negative impact on the rural residents’ income gap. Moreover, democratization strengthens the influence of fiscal expenditure on the rural residents’ income gap. Therefore, we present four proposals, including strengthening grass-roots administrative reform, increasing the subsidies to agriculture, perfecting the infrastructure, and promoting the reform of democratization.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: DEStech Transactions on Social Science, Education and Human Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
