The relationship between socioeconomic status and perinatal outcomes in in vitro fertilization conceptions

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate whether socioeconomic status has an impact on perinatal outcomes in in-vitro-fertilization pregnancies. We hypothesize that with greater coverage there may be an alleviation of the financial burden of IVF which can facilitates application of evidence-based practices. BackgroundIn-vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most used assisted reproductive technology in the United States, with growing efficiency and demand for in-vitro fertilization. Certain states have mandated coverage that enable low-income individuals to undergo in-vitro fertilization treatment. Study DesignA retrospective population-based observational study was conducted in accordance with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) database over the six-year period from 2008 to 2014 examining 10,000 in-vitro-fertilization deliveries. Maternal outcomes of interest included preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM), preterm birth (i.e., before 37 weeks of gestation), placental abruption, Caesarean Section (C/S), operative vaginal delivery, spontaneous vaginal delivery (SVD), maternal infection, chorioamnionitis, hysterectomy, and postpartum hemorrhage. Neonatal outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA) defined as birth weight less than tenth percentile, intrauterine fetal death (IUFD), and congenital anomalies. ResultsOur study found that socioeconomic status did not have a statistically relevant effect on perinatal outcomes in women who underwent in-vitro-fertilization to conceive after adjusting for the potential confounding effects of maternal demographic, pre-existing clinical characteristics, and comorbidities. ConclusionThe literature suggests that in states with mandated in-vitro-fertilization coverage, there are better perinatal outcomes due in part to greater utilization of best IVF practices, such as single-embryo transfers. Moreover, the quality of medical care in states with coverage is in the highest quartile in the country. Therefore, our findings of equivalent perinatal outcomes in IVF care irrelevant of socio-economic status suggests that a possibly of lack of access to quality medical care may be a factor in the health disparities usually seen in lower socioeconomic status individuals.