Abstract
There are difficulties in measuring the molecular weight (Mw) of bacterial cellulose (BC) using Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) analysis. Additionally, the Mark-Houwink-Sakurada equation cannot be used to predict the Mw of BC as no Mark-Houwink-Sakurada constant specific to BC is available. In this study, a systematic approach is developed to establish the relationship between the Mw of BC and the viscosity of its copper (II) ethylenediamine (CED) solutions. Impurities contained in the raw BC are examined and appropriate purification procedures are designed for their removal before the above two measurements are conducted. The Mw of BC is obtained by measuring the Degree of Polymerization of its corresponding cellulose acetate (CA), derived from degraded BC, using GPC analysis, and the viscosity of the CED solutions of the BC is measured using a BS/U Tube viscometer. In this paper, the Mark–Houwink–Sakurada constants (K=0.3752 mL/g and α\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\alpha$$\\end{document}=1.4532) specific for BC are determined to relate the Mw of BC with the intrinsic viscosity of its CED solutions. It is also found that the Mw of BC is proportional to the dynamic viscosity (i.e.,ηBC=0.0183Mw1.3069\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$\\eta _{BC} =0.0183Mw^{1.3069}$$\\end{document}) and the flow time (i.e., tBC=1.3809\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$t_{BC} =1.3809$$\\end{document}Mw1.3062\\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \\usepackage{amsmath} \\usepackage{wasysym} \\usepackage{amsfonts} \\usepackage{amssymb} \\usepackage{amsbsy} \\usepackage{mathrsfs} \\usepackage{upgreek} \\setlength{\\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \\begin{document}$$^{1.3062}$$\\end{document}) of its CED solutions. These BC-specific relationships can help determine the Mw of BC from the rheological properties of its CED solutions.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.