Abstract

An enduring question is unity vs. separability of executive deficits resulting from impaired frontal lobe function. In previous studies, we have asked how executive deficits link to a conventional measure of fluid intelligence, obtained either by standard tests of novel problem-solving, or by averaging performance in a battery of novel tasks. For some classical executive tasks, such as the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Verbal Fluency, and Trail Making Test B (TMTB), frontal deficits are entirely explained by fluid intelligence. However, on a second set of executive tasks, including tests of multitasking and decision making, deficits exceed those predicted by fluid intelligence loss. In this paper we discuss how these results shed light on the diverse clinical phenomenology observed in frontal dysfunction, and present new data on a group of 15 schizophrenic patients and 14 controls. Subjects were assessed with a range of executive tests and with a general cognitive battery used to derive a measure of fluid intelligence. Group performance was compared and fluid intelligence was introduced as a covariate. In line with our previous results, significant patient-control differences in classical executive tests were removed when fluid intelligence was introduced as a covariate. However, for tests of multitasking and decision making, deficits remained. We relate our findings to those of previous factor analytic studies describing a single principal component, which accounts for much of the variance of schizophrenic patients' cognitive performance. We propose that this general factor reflects low fluid intelligence capacity, which accounts for much but not all cognitive impairment in this patient group. Partialling out the general effects of fluid intelligence, we propose, may clarify the role of additional, more specific cognitive impairments in conditions such as schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • The efforts of multiple disciplines have brought substantial advances in the comprehension on frontal lobe functioning, much remains unclear in how this brain region participates in the organization of effective behavior

  • PARTICIPANTS Fifteen patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenia according to DSM-IV criteria were recruited for a broader ongoing study of schizophrenia at the Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO)

  • The schizophrenic group was significantly impaired on all tests, including the classical executive tests [Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST): t(27) = −3.31, p < 0.01; Verbal Fluency: t(27) = −2.86, p < 0.01; Trail Making Test B (TMTB) t(27) = 2.48, p = 0.02] and the tests of multitasking and decision making [Hotel: t(27) = 3.34, p < 0.01; Iowa Gambling Test (IGT): t(27) = −3.47, p < 0.01]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The efforts of multiple disciplines have brought substantial advances in the comprehension on frontal lobe functioning, much remains unclear in how this brain region participates in the organization of effective behavior. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) is supposed to participate in distributed brain circuits underlying “executive” functions, broadly conceived as processes that organize and control cognitive activity. Advances in cognitive neuroscience have rarely translated into improved clinical analysis and management of pathologies affecting frontal lobe functions. In this paper we discuss previous results coming from basic and clinical neuroscience in order to shed light on the diverse clinical phenomenology observed in frontal dysfunction. Our results cast light on the balance between global cognitive deficit and specific functional impairments

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call