Abstract
The quality of extra-financial information is an important determinant of the quality of asset allocation. This article illustrates the difficulty of defining the quality of information by comparing the two main sustainability accounting standards. It then explains why high-quality sustainability reports are hard to come by. An analysis of the main steps required to calculate ESG ratings illustrates the difficulties in synthesizing a company’s ESG performance, and the paper concludes with empirical studies showing that the quality of ESG ratings still needs to be improved.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.