Abstract

The paper shows how the publication of court decisions influenced the formation of a precedent. The author reviewed scientific works devoted to research the precedent in common and continental law. The research explains that the formation of precedent in England was accompanied by development of the judgment’s reviews and their prevalence among lawyers. Of course, publication of court decisions was not a major factor in setting a precedent, but it played a significant role in this. The paper also describes facts of the publication of court decisions in Italy, Germany, France and the Netherlands, as well as the admissibility of their citations at the court of cassation. The general idea of the paper is that convincing precedent exists and is used although the countries of continental law do not have a «classic» precedent. The paper gives a review of the importance of the state register of court decisions for setting a convincing precedent in Ukraine. The author analyzes the pros and cons of citing court decisions. It’s stated that, unfortunately, the quotations of court decisions is not always correct and sometimes amounts to rewriting the «right» legal position without comparing the circumstances of the case. The article concludes that the practice of applying a convincing precedent in Ukraine is only emerging and needs further improvement.
 It has been found out that the publication of judgments of supreme courts is one of the factors that helped to establish precedent in common law countries. The publication of court rulings also created the conditions for a convincing precedent in civil law countries (especially in private law). At the same time, the formation of a “convincing precedent» in countries where court decisions are published in publicly available electronic court registers is much faster than in common law countries. Of course, the structure and the significance of the precedent in the common law and civil law countries are different, but one cannot dismiss that publication of court decisions as one of the factors for establishing the precedent.

Highlights

  • It is noted that the content of the current civil legislation

  • which is unacceptable. The author draws a distinction between these notions

  • to the fact that a basic factor that resulted a perception of the synonymy of the notions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Разом із тим виникнення і формування прецеденту пов’язується також і з цитуванням (описом, конспектуванням) судових рішень. Метою цієї статті є з’ясування ступеня впливу оприлюднення судових рішень на становлення прецеденту як джерела права. За Маршаллом суди нижчих інстанцій зобов’язані дотримуватись прецеденту навіть у випадку, коли вважають його помилковим, натомість суди вищих інстанцій повинні мати можливість змінити прецедент або відійти від нього у разі помилковості останнього.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call