Abstract
Two hypotheses are presented in article. Hypothesis 1: The psychology of sustainability is person ability to retain health at the psychophysiological, psychological, and psychosocial levels of life under the influence of destroyers. As it appears from a hypothesis, we allocate three main a factor - psychophysiological, psychological, psychosocial. These factors form uniform model of a research of sustainability of the person. Two formulas by which it is possible to determine the general sustainability of the person and private sustainability are presented in article. Empirical data which can be interesting to much are provided in table 1. In it different age and social categories of the respondents choosing any given factor are presented. The hypothesis 2 represents the dynamic party of sustainability of the person. The dynamic side of sustainability is presented by three phenomena - it is process, this state, this property. These phenomena are peculiar to each factor of sustainability of the person. In the conclusion of article, it is indicated the separate direction in psychology - «Psychology sustainability».
Highlights
IntroductionSarkar in work [2] write that the a) specific nature of a definition is often influenced by the historical and sociocultural context within which the research was conducted, the researchers’ conceptual proclivities, and the population sampled; b) one of the main difficulties in conducting research on resilience is that wide discrepancies exist in the way that resilience is defined and conceptualized, conceptual discrepancies hinder the evaluation and comparison of resilience research findings, preclude meta-analysis, and make it difficult to operationalize the construct for measurement purposes
The first group included methods of research the following keywords to search for literature: the psychology of sustainability [6], psychology of stability [7], psychology of resistance [8], psychology of resilience [9]
The analysis of sources showed that all research take place in three main directions: psychophysiology, psychology and psychosociology
Summary
Sarkar in work [2] write that the a) specific nature of a definition is often influenced by the historical and sociocultural context within which the research was conducted, the researchers’ conceptual proclivities, and the population sampled; b) one of the main difficulties in conducting research on resilience is that wide discrepancies exist in the way that resilience is defined and conceptualized, conceptual discrepancies hinder the evaluation and comparison of resilience research findings, preclude meta-analysis, and make it difficult to operationalize the construct for measurement purposes
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
