Abstract

It is shown that the absorption correction f(χ) is dependent on two parameters: the mean depth which essentially determines the correction for f(χ)>0·8 and which accounts for variations with incident beam energy, and a shape function that is a function of overvoltage ratio and the mean atomic number of the specimen. The commonly used modified Philibert correction represents the mean depth reasonably well but has a very inadequate shape function.The general effect of the shape function can be demonstrated conveniently by the behaviour of the ratio f(χ)/fsq(χ) where fsq(χ) is the absorption correction predicted by a square model for the depth distribution of ionization. For many practical purposes the overvoltage variation of the shape function can be neglected, but there is always a substantial atomic number dependence in the range 0·05<f(χ)<0·5.Although there are not sufficient consistent experimental data available on which to base an accurate absorption correction covering the full range of f(χ), possible forms for such a correction procedure are discussed. A simple expression for use in the case of high absorption, f(χ)<0·2, is proposed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.