Abstract
The aim of this paper is to present an analysis of the postmodern space in Paul Auster’s novel Moon Palace (1989). In the analysis, the author relies on De Certeau’s (1980) distinction between ‘place’ and ‘space’ and the importance of the existence of stories for the production of space, Lefebvre’s (1991) notion of dialectically produced space and the conceptual triad of space, and Murphet’s (2004) view of postmodern time as the time of the death of the subject. The concrete examples from the novel are Marco’s and Barber’s bodies, Marco’s apartment, the Central Park, the theatre, Effing’s apartment, Chinatown, and the cave. The paper is expected to show that the principles of the production of space are applicable to the space in the novel Moon Palace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
