Abstract
The phenomenon of information conflict at the moment is an actual research object of many social and humanitarian disciplines. On the other hand, there is a lack of fundamental theoretical, primarily philosophical and methodological, research on this issue. This is expressed, inter alia, in the absence of philosophical and methodological grounds for isolating an information conflict from the totality of all objectively observed communications, i.e. demarcation of the phenomenon. The problem of finding criteria for an information conflict is of key importance in the formation of the methodological foundations and categorical apparatus for studying this phenomenon. In this regard, the need to develop theoretical foundations for the demarcation of information conflict is an urgent research task. The object of this work is the phenomenon of information conflict as part of the communicative process. The subject of the research is the problem of demarcation of information conflicts from all aggregate communications. The purpose of the study is to describe and substantiate the existing object-oriented methodologies that allow for the demarcation procedure. The following tasks are adequately formulated for the purpose of the study: 1) describe the problem of demarcation; 2) identify the communicative grounds of the information conflict; 3) analyze and highlight the main approaches to the problem of demarcation of information conflict. The novelty of the work lies in the systematic description and structuring of methodological approaches to the problem of demarcation of information conflicts, as well as analysis of the boundaries of methodologies and approaches. In the course of the work, it was determined and proved that, relying solely on the theory of communication, it is impossible to adequately carry out the demarcation procedure; it is necessary to use additional, non-communicative demarcation criteria, which is due to the variety of demarcation approaches in various studies. In conclusion, conclusions are formulated about the limitations of object-oriented approaches for solving the problem of demarcation of information conflicts.
Highlights
Применение метода контент-анализа и, следовательно, контент-демаркации для информационного конфликта присутствует в трудах Ф
Для демаркации информационного конфликта недостаточно опираться только на теорию коммуникации и объектно-ориентированные подходы: необходимы более широкие философско-методологические основания
Соответственно, в эпистемологическом отношении информационный конфликт можно определить как совокупность коммуникативных актов, содержащих в себе элементы информационной манипуляции, воздействующих на когнитивные модели с целью трансформации субъективности, и, как следствие, деятельности субъектов
Summary
В работе постулируется тезис о том, что процесс демаркации информационных конфликтов включает в себя два уровня: демаркацию первого порядка — выявление критериев информационного конфликта, которые имплицитно включены в структуру коммуникации, и демаркацию второго порядка — выявление внекоммуникативных критериев, на основании которых верифицируется информационный конфликт. Какой именно уровень демаркации позволяет выделить эпистемологические критерии информационного конфликта. Существуют ли в теории коммуникации основания для того, чтобы маркировать субъекта как создателя манипулятивных информационных объектов?
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
