Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of positive quantitative urine cultures in dogs with an inactive urine sediment.
 Background: A urinalysis is a useful screening tool for the evaluation of evidence of bacterial cystitis and a quantitative urine culture is used for definitive diagnosis.
 Evidentiary value: A retrospective chart review from June 2012 to December 2017 at three private practice emergency and specialty referral hospitals examined urine samples obtained from 100 client-owned dogs.
 Methods: The signalment and clinicopathologic data was recorded for all canine patients that had urine samples obtained by cystocentesis that had an inactive sediment exam on urinalysis and subsequent quantitative urine cultures were performed.
 Results: The prevalence of positive quantitative urine cultures in all dogs with an inactive urine sediment at the aforementioned institutions was 6% (6/100). Escherichia coli was the most commonly isolated bacteria.
 Conclusion: Given the low prevalence of positive quantitative urine cultures in dogs with an inactive urine sediment and current guideline recommendations for management of subclinical bacteriuria, we do not recommend urine cultures for dogs without lower urinary tract signs. Further prospective study of patient subgroups, as well as controlled studies evaluating urine sample handling techniques using methods available to private practice practitioners are sorely needed.
 Application: Emergency and general practicing veterinarians should consider a quantitative urine culture for dogs with lower urinary tract signs, even with an inactive sediment examination, and on a case-by-case basis for dogs with pertinent systemic diseases or known risk factors for bacterial cystitis.
 

Highlights

  • Urinalysis and quantitative urine culture (QUC) are common diagnostics performed in a wide population of both human and veterinary patients

  • A urinalysis is a useful screening tool for the evaluation of evidence of bacterial cystitis and a quantitative urine culture is used for definitive diagnosis

  • A QUC should be performed in cases of known or suspected bacterial cystitis or pyelonephritis to determine the infectious agent and guide antimicrobial usage (Weese et al, 2019; Ettinger, 2017)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urinalysis and quantitative urine culture (QUC) are common diagnostics performed in a wide population of both human and veterinary patients. A urinalysis is a useful screening tool in the evaluation for supporting evidence of bacterial cystitis (Weese et al, 2019), urine culture is the gold standard to diagnose or rule out bacteriuria (Ettinger, 2017). There are occasions when a positive QUC is obtained from urine that has no evidence of bacteria or inflammation on urinalysis. This scenario may be due to the limitations of light microscopy in detecting low numbers of bacteria compared to QUC (Ettinger, 2017). A urinalysis is a useful screening tool for the evaluation of evidence of bacterial cystitis and a quantitative urine culture is used for definitive diagnosis. Evidentiary value: A retrospective chart review from June 2012 to December 2017 at three private practice emergency and specialty referral hospitals examined urine samples obtained from 100 client-owned dogs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call