Abstract
A series of tests is being carried out with the object of determining whether the relations evident in New Zealand and Japan, between precursory swarms and major earthquakes, are of value for long‐range, synoptic earthquake forecasting. The first New Zealand test (completed in 1990) showed that clustering, both of swarms and of mainshock events, should be allowed for, and the hypothesis was reformulated accordingly. The second New Zealand test, now completed, confirms the importance of clustering. It also reveals that the applicability of the swarm/mainshock relations is strongly affected by large‐scale tectonics. Further, a simulation study shows that, at the end of the test, the performance of the swarm hypothesis relative to the Poisson model lay between what would be expected if the hypothesis and the Poisson model, respectively, were correct in general. These results support a further reformulation of the hypothesis, which is now taken to be strongly applicable in the Hikurangi and Fiordland subduction zones, not at all in the region of Quaternary volcanism, and weakly elsewhere. This change and the provision for clustering made previously bring the present New Zealand formulation close to that under test in the Japan region. The third New Zealand test commenced on 20 December 1995 and is still in progress.
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.