Abstract
Remote and rural communities in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by infectious animal diseases due to their close contact with livestock and limited access to animal health personnel). However, animal disease surveillance and diagnosis in LMICs is often challenging, and turnaround times between sample submission and diagnosis can take days to weeks. This diagnostic gap and subsequent disease under‐reporting can allow emerging and transboundary animal pathogens to spread, with potentially serious and far‐reaching consequences. Point‐of‐care tests (POCTs), which allow for rapid diagnosis of infectious diseases in non‐laboratory settings, have the potential to significantly disrupt traditional animal health surveillance paradigms in LMICs. This literature review sought to identify POCTs currently available for diagnosing infectious animal diseases and to determine facilitators and barriers to their use and uptake in LMICs. Results indicated that some veterinary POCTs have been used for field‐based animal disease diagnosis in LMICs with good results. However, many POCTs target a small number of key agricultural and zoonotic animal diseases, while few exist for other important animal diseases. POCT evaluation is rarely taken beyond the laboratory and into the field where they are predicted to have the greatest impact, and where conditions can greatly affect test performance. A lack of mandated test validation regulations for veterinary POCTs has allowed tests of varying quality to enter the market, presenting challenges for potential customers. The use of substandard, improperly validated or unsuitable POCTs in LMICs can greatly undermine their true potential and can have far‐reaching negative impacts on disease control. To successfully implement novel rapid diagnostic pathways for animal disease in LMICs, technical, regulatory, socio‐political and economic challenges must be overcome, and further research is urgently needed before the potential of animal disease POCTs can be fully realized.
Highlights
In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), accurate and timely diagnosis of infectious diseases in human, let alone animal, populations remains challenging
To explore possible reasons for this gap, this literature review sought to investigate whether Point-of-care tests (POCTs) are currently being used in LMICs for diagnosis of infectious and zoonotic animal diseases, to determine characteristics of “ideal” POCTs that would facilitate their use and to identify any barriers to uptake in these settings
We screened articles based on titles, abstracts and full texts, and purposively selected representative articles for inclusion in this review based on the following criteria: (i)Inclusion criteria: Any publications relating to the testing, validation, review and commentary of diagnostic POCTs for infectious animal diseases in LMICs, published in English, in any year through and including January 2020
Summary
In many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), accurate and timely diagnosis of infectious diseases in human, let alone animal, populations remains challenging. Livestock and poultry provide food, agricultural labour, clothing, fertilizers and social status and act as wealth assets to more than 600 million livestock-dependent people around the world (Grace et al, 2012; Randolph et al, 2007) This dependence comes with a disproportionately high burden of zoonotic infections and leaves the health and livelihoods of many rural communities vulnerable to incursions of animal diseases (WHO, Dfid, FAO, & OIE, 2006). POCTs, known as “rapid diagnostic tests”, “point of need tests” and “near patient tests”, come in a range of different formats, and are currently being used by human, animal and plant industries for a range of applications worldwide They are designed to be portable, user-friendly, simple to use, and usually have a turnaround time from sample to result in under an hour, allowing diagnosis and management decisions to be initiated within the same encounter. To explore possible reasons for this gap, this literature review sought to investigate whether POCTs are currently being used in LMICs for diagnosis of infectious and zoonotic animal diseases, to determine characteristics of “ideal” POCTs that would facilitate their use and to identify any barriers to uptake in these settings
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have