Abstract
In this paper, comparative data from a number of Nguni and other South Eastern Bantu languages are utilised to argue that the Nguni locative prefixes e-, o-, ke-, la- or layi-, expressing the general locative significance of ‘at. on, to, etc.’, probably originated from a demonstrative base that manifests as either la- or na-, depending on the language concerned. This paper shows how Wilkes' (1993) proposal that this prefix probably developed from a demonstrative base la-, could be amended to account for a wider range of data than he initially envisaged. The amended hypothesis as proposed in this paper, succeeds in accounting for the possible diachronic origin of the various manifestations of this prefix in all of the Nguni languages.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
