Abstract

This article proposes a new explanatory framework to understand the transversal developments that have emerged from the recent case law of the Court of Justice of the EU on the Framework Employment Directive. It argues that the Court operates a functional differentiation in the implementation of anti-discrimination norms, which gives rise to a complex interpretation architecture. Following the constitutionalization of EU equality law, the Court reads three main functions into the Framework Employment Directive: socialization, integrity, and calibration. This differentiation gives rise to competing interpretive paradigms and analytical templates that affect the level and shape of equality protection under the Directive. Directive 2000/78/EC, Charter of Fundamental Rights, Equality, Discrimination, non-discrimination, Functional differentiation, Socialization, Integrity, Calibration, Competing interpretive paradigms, Framework Employment Directive

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call