Abstract
There was never any prevalence of debates about differential integration and future of European integration in Cyprus. European issues have always been secondary in local debates, except when they tend to affect Cyprus directly, the de facto partition of the country and the potential for its resolution or economic and political interest of Cypriots. During pre-accession times the completion between political forces to appear more European than their opponents but the Europeanisation processes were rather superficial. In the post accession period, political debates were primarily shaped by a competition between Government, opposition forces, political parties and leaders who often debate about who is better fit to manage the various European policies in the political life of Cyprus, rather than genuinely debating about the nature, direction and character of the European Union, its future direction in terms of integration processes and the potential. After the 2013 austerity measures, Eurosceptical views and sentiments were developed which questioned the initial unconditional support for the EU integration processes. Nevertheless, differential integration is not a subject that has any prominence in Cypriot politics or public debates.
Highlights
There was never any prevalence of debates about differential integration and future of European integration in Cyprus
Issues relating to EU-level policymaking do not attract much attention by the Greek Cypriot media and political parties
It is rather the EU that is assessed as an active entity and whose actions impact the interests of the Republic of Cyprus and its citizens.”6 This is because Cypriot party discourses “do not create a global vision for the EU, but only fragmented visions through interpretation of various Cypriot issues in the European context,” of which the “essence consists of rationalising the manner through which Cyprus may benefit from its participation in the EU.”
Summary
In the context of Cyprus, differentiated integration (DI) appears to be of low salience in almost all the years in this analysis. Salience peaked around 2017 and 2018, when the Minister of Finance addressed matters relating to the economy. There was no clear position on how government officials and political parties perceived the future of integration in the EU. Interventions by ministers referred to the possibilities for the future of EU integration by taking a rather vague position, focusing on internal politics rather than considering EU-wide debates
Submitted Version (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have