Abstract

This paper addresses the debate on the political regulation of technological risks currently taking place in the fields of policy analysis, research on neo-corporatism and sociological theory, and then goes on to interrelate these areas of research and discourse. It starts with the assumption that political regulation takes place in the interpenetration zone between the different functional subsystems of social action; subsystems which operate according to their own laws analytically, but merge in concrete social action empirically. Political regulation is an arena in which we can study the interchange between these functional subsystems and the reciprocal transformation of communication media. The paper discusses four ideal-typical models of interchange: synthesis, competition, statism and compromise. These models have specific effects on the formulation of political regulation in terms of its effectiveness and flexibility. The dynamics of political regulation are characterized by processes of upswing, downswing, inflation, deflation and recession. The theory of generalized communication media provides the analytical tools for investigating these dynamic processes. Due to limited space, the paper concentrates on the interchange between the political system and the societal community and the reciprocal transformation and dynamic processing of political power and influence.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.