Abstract

This paper seeks to provide an overview of some of the main areas of debate that have emerged in recent years at the interface between theories of justice and health care. First, the paper considers various positions as to what the index of justice with respect to health ought to be. It warns on practical and principled grounds against conceptual inflation of the notion of "health" as it appears in theories of distributive justice. Second, it considers how various standards according to which goods ought to be distributed in a just society apply to debates within health care.

Highlights

  • Le présent article vise à fournir un aperçu de certains des principaux débats qui ont émergé ces dernières années entre les théories de la justice et la réflexion sur les soins de santé

  • How do we ascertain that the consent provided by research subject x Many institutional and political debates have to do with the ethimeets the standard of free and informed consent ?) and distributive cally best ways in which to distribute health, or at least the resources justice

  • We find theorists who believe that the While Rawls’ formulation of the resource-centered position has libertarian’s emphasis on choice is defensible only against a back- been enormously influential, it does not provide clear guidance on 110 ground of fair distributions of resources

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Le présent article vise à fournir un aperçu de certains des principaux débats qui ont émergé ces dernières années entre les théories de la justice et la réflexion sur les soins de santé.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call