Abstract
To investigate the pre-clinical relevancy of a machinable composite, its physical properties were evaluated and compared with a machinable ceramic and two indirect composites. A machinable resin composite (GN-I composite, CO), a machinable ceramic (GN-I ceramic, CE), and two resin composites (Artglass dentin, AG; Estenia dentin, ET) were used. Compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, and fracture load of standardized, premolar crown-shaped specimens were determined. In terms of compressive strength, diametral tensile strength, and flexural strength, AG showed significantly lower values than the other three materials. In terms of fracture load, specimens with 1.5 mm thick wall showed a higher value than those with 1.0 mm thick wall, and the value decreased in the order of ET, CE, CO, and AG. Marginal tipping was also observed in ET and CE. Within the limits of the current study, CO showed physical properties favorable for constructing esthetic restorations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
