The phylogenetic significance of bone types in euteleost fishes

Abstract

The paradentary is a small, sometimes dentigerous element in the lower jaw of some atherinomorph neoteleost fishes. Identification of the paradentary as a neomorphic, perichondrally ossified bone prompted re-examination of theories of the association of bone and teeth in teleost fishes. Teeth on a chondral lower jaw bone might be explained simply by epidermal-mesodermal interactions. Since the work of Kolliker in 1859, it has been known that there are two basic types of bone in teleost fishes: cellular bone, characterized by a matrix that has enclosed osteoblasts or osteocytes; and acellular bone, characterized by a relatively featureless matrix that lacks these bone-forming cells. Cellular bone is typical of lower teleosts, whereas acellular bone is typical of higher teleosts. Ontogenetic data indicate that acellular bone is derived relative to cellular bone. Even though identification of cellular and acellular bone can be made readily with histological preparations, acellular bone has been used infrequently as a character in analyses of teleost phytogeny. Acellular bone is considered here to be a derived character within teleost fishes. It is found in all Neoteleostei as well as some, but not all Salmoniformes. Independent of studies of bone, derived types of teeth in teleosts have been described in terms of their failure to become completely mineralized. Acellular bone and teeth of higher teleosts share several properties, including a large fraction of collagen. Teleosts lack a parathyroid gland; bone type is critical to the mechanism of calcium regulation. It is proposed that the character of acellular bone be incorporated into phylogenetic analyses of teleost fishes by correlating it with derived types of tooth structure.