Abstract

The phylogenetic relationships among Homo, Gorilla and Pan are still controversial. Some anatomical and genetic comparisons suggest that Pan is more closely related to Gorilla than it is to Homo. A larger number of genetic comparisons, and a recent analysis of morphology, suggest that Pan and Homo share the most recent common ancestry among these genera. The inconsistency across genetic studies can be explained by hypothesizing that (a) the last common ancestor of all three lineages was polymorphic at a number of loci and (b) that the two divergences that gave rise to these three lineages occurred close together in time. If these two hypotheses are correct, then a model based on the random loss or retention of alternative alleles segregating at polymorphic loci in the last common ancestor can explain the apparent discrepancies. Observed levels of DNA polymorphism in extant primates and the consensus time frame for this diversification indicate this is a plausible model. The available DNA sequence data are best explained by inferring that all three lineages diverged from a single common ancestor over a brief period of time, i.e., that the diversification was effectively a trichotomy. This model challenges the common assumption that two independent and temporally separate speciation events occurred during the diversification of the African hominoids.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.