Abstract
The civil engineering umbrella encompasses many different disciplines--from construction management to water resources management, and everything in between. Consequently, in civil engineering organizations nationwide, often there is conflict and infighting among the various disciplines. Perhaps this could be attributable to differences in the ways these disciplines see their world. This paper uses a modified Myers-Briggs Type Indicator to determine the personality types of construction engineers and design engineers at a State Public Agency. The results indicate that the construction and design engineers share similar predominant personality traits. They are predominantly introverted, preferring to focus their energy on the internal world of ideas and possibilities. They prefer to gather their facts using their senses and are predisposed to facts and figures. When making decisions, they prefer to forego pure logic, relying instead on personal and organizational values. Finally, they show a slight preference for a structured environment. The greatest differences between the construction and design engineers were found in their preferences for decision making. Although both disciplines preferred using their values in decision making rather than pure logic, the designers chose value-oriented responses more frequently than did the construction engineers. Possible reasons for similarities and differences are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Journal of Management in Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.