Abstract

The International Height Reference System (IHRS), adopted by International Association of Geodesy (IAG) in its Resolution No. 1 at the XXVI General Assembly of the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG) in Prague in 2015, contains two novelties. Firstly, the mean-tide concept is adopted for handling the permanent tide. While many national height systems continue to apply the mean-tide concept, this was the first time that the IAG officially introduced it for a potential field quantity. Secondly, the reference level of the height system is defined by the equipotential surface where the geopotential has a conventional value W0 = 62,636,853.4 m2 s–2. This value was first determined empirically to provide a good approximation to the global mean sea level and then adopted as a reference value by convention. I analyse the tidal aspects of the reference level based on W0. By definition, W0 is independent of the tidal concept that was adopted for the equipotential surface, but for different concepts, different functions are involved in the W of the equation W = W0. I find that, in the empirical determination of the adopted estimate W0, the permanent tide is treated inconsistently. However, the consistent estimate from the same data rounds off to the same value. I discuss the tidal conventions and formulas for the International Height Reference Frame (IHRF) and the realisation of the IHRS. I propose a simplified definition of IHRF geopotential numbers that would make it possible to transform between the IHRF and zero-tide geopotential numbers using a simple datum-difference surface. Such a transformation would not be adequate if rigorous mean-tide formulas were imposed. The IHRF should adopt a conventional (best) estimate of the permanent tide-generating potential, such as that which is contained in the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service Conventions, and use it as a basis for other conventional formulas. The tide-free coordinates of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame and tide-free Global Geopotential Models are central in the modelling of geopotential for the purposes of the IHRF. I present a set of correction formulas that can be used to move to the zero-tide model before, during, or after the processing, and finally to the mean-tide IHRF. To reduce the confusion around the multitude of tidal concepts, I propose that modelling should primarily be done using the zero-tide concept, with the mean-tide potential as an add-on. The widespread use of the expression “systems of permanent tide” may also have contributed to the confusion, as such “systems” do not have the properties that are generally associated with other “systems” in geodesy. Hence, this paper mostly uses “concept” instead of “system” when referring to the permanent tide.

Highlights

  • As the apparent motion of the Sun, the Moon, and the planets is concentrated above the low latitudes, the time averages of their tide-generating potentials are not zero

  • Later, when corrections to geodetic quantities were made using tidal spectroscopy, the method for many quantities usually was to make, at the first step, a correction using the total tide-generating potential and refine it for the most important waves. This is the method that has been applied in the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) Conventions, both for the geopotential and for the station positions, starting with McCarthy (1992)

  • If we work with tide-free International Terrestrial Reference Frame (ITRF) coordinates and with a tide-free GGM but, skip both of the two corrections going into Eq (40) we have evaluated the tide-free geopotential at the tide-free coordinates

Read more

Summary

Concepts

As the apparent motion of the Sun, the Moon, and the planets is concentrated above the low latitudes, the time averages of their tide-generating potentials are not zero. Later, when corrections to geodetic quantities were made using tidal spectroscopy, the method for many quantities usually was (and still is) to make, at the first step, a correction using the total tide-generating potential and refine it for the most important waves This is the method that has been applied in the International Earth Rotation and Reference Systems Service (IERS) Conventions, both for the geopotential and for the station positions, starting with McCarthy (1992). 5, I propose a solution: use the mean-tide geoid as a reference surface for the IHRF geopotential numbers but eliminate the height dependence of WT from them by convention This amounts to the way the permanent tide is treated when national and regional mean-tide height systems are created using levelling networks

Basic relations
Geoids in different concepts of the permanent tide
Time average of the tide‐generating potential
Derived expressions
Tide‐free quantities
ITRF coordinates
Restoring the zero tide to GGMs and consequences for the potential
Mean‐tide heights in a rigorous definition?
Technique‐related issues
Orthometric heights
Normal heights
A conventional definition for geopotential numbers in IHRF
Dissemination issues
Summary and discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call