Abstract
Duguit argued that property must evolve to mean that property rights should have social functions. But he was decidedly ambiguous on what specifically ‘social functions’ demand. This chapter aims to investigate how the ‘social function’ of property may influence other regulations and provisions in the current Chinese context. To this end, this chapter shall broach four topics—the constitutional property clause, rural land reform, social capital’s role in an efficient operation of homeowners’ associations, and limitations on copyright—illustrative of how the social function of property is applied in contemporary China.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
