Abstract
This chapter extends prior research into what prevents governments from adopting outcome-based performance management as a dominant mode of governance through an analysis of reforms unfolding in Swedish central government over the last three decades. In doing so, I conceive of different performance management practices as an integral part of broader governance logics that buttress particular ways of defining performance. The relatively limited use of outcome-based performance management in Swedish central government is explained with reference to a series of incomplete shifts between such governance logics, which have moderated the impetus behind reforms and created hybrid governance practices.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
