Abstract

This paper discusses the use of outcome-based performance management in Swedish central government agencies, with particular reference to how it has evolved in response to the government's growing emphasis on citizen orientation and interagency collaboration. Although a general tendency toward increasing reliance on subjective, user-perceived outcomes is discernible, the use of outcome indicators for internal control purposes is still limited. We also observe inconsistencies and tensions between different outcome indicators in several policy areas and a tendency for some agencies to trade off achievement of these and adapt selectively to the government's reform agenda. The implications of these findings for research and policy development are discussed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.