Abstract
Despite claims that ADR offers “better” solutions than tradiational approaches (such as the courts), the field of dispute resolution has trouble proving its case. The reason is that we lack basen‐line data on the effective ness of both tradiatonal and nontraditional dispute resolution methods. Praqctitioners and researchers of dispule resolution should work together and in collaboration with public and private sector institutions to incorporate systemized data collection and evaluation into ADR practice. The growing subfield of dispute system design offers particularly rich ground for such collaboration between the research and practice communities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
