Abstract

Since World War II the need to repair became progressively a human rights concern and a victim-oriented endeavour. Twenty years ago REDRESS TRUST was founded and this young and vibrant organisation developed into a widely appreciated actor in the quest for reparative justice. REDRESS distinguished itself by applying a variety of effective means and methods,including high-quality and thorough studies, intercessions to hold perpetrators accountable and securing remedies to victims and obtaining reparations for survivors of torture. There is still a striking gap between proclaimed standards of justice and harsh realities leaving large categories of victims unnoticed, unacknowledged and unattended. Domestic legal and social orders disclose legal shortcomings, political obstacles, lack of resources and incapacity of the most vulnerable segments of victimized groups and individuals to get effective access to reparative justice. While the UN Reparation Principles provide a good deal of latitude in affording various forms of monetary and non-monetary reparations, any margins or latitudes in shaping reparative policies and programmes may never ignore the principles of non-discrimination and non-exclusion.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.