Abstract

The ecosystem approach—as endorsed by the Convention on Biological Diversity (CDB) in 2000—is a strategy for holistic, sustainable, and equitable natural resource management, to be implemented via the 12 Malawi Principles. These principles describe the need to manage nature in terms of dynamic ecosystems, while fully engaging with local peoples. It is an ambitious concept. Today, the term is common throughout the research and policy literature on environmental management. However, multiple meanings have been attached to the term, resulting in confusion. We reviewed references to the ecosystem approach from 1957 to 2012 and identified 3 primary uses: as an alternative to ecosystem management or ecosystem-based management; in reference to an integrated and equitable approach to resource management as per the CBD; and as a term signifying a focus on understanding and valuing ecosystem services. Although uses of this term and its variants may overlap in meaning, typically, they do not entirely reflect the ethos of the ecosystem approach as defined by the CBD. For example, there is presently an increasing emphasis on ecosystem services, but focusing on these alone does not promote decentralization of management or use of all forms of knowledge, both of which are integral to the CBD’s concept. We highlight that the Malawi Principles are at risk of being forgotten. To better understand these principles, more effort to implement them is required. Such efforts should be evaluated, ideally with comparative approaches, before allowing the CBD’s concept of holistic and socially engaged management to be abandoned or superseded. It is possible that attempts to implement all 12 principles together will face many challenges, but they may also offer a unique way to promote holistic and equitable governance of natural resources. Therefore, we believe that the CBD’s concept of the ecosystem approach demands more attention.La Necesidad de Desenredar Conceptos Clave del Argot Ambiente-EstrategiaResumenLa estrategia ambiental – como es promocionada por la Convención Biológica sobre Diversidad en 2000 – es una estrategia para un manejo holístico, sustentable y equitativo de recursos naturales, que habrá de implementarse por vía de los 12 Principios de Malawi. Estos principios describen la necesidad de manejar la naturaleza en términos de ecosistemas dinámicos, mientras se compromete totalmente con las personas locales. Es un concepto ambicioso. Hoy en día, el término es común en la investigación y la literatura de políticas sobre el manejo ambiente. Sin embargo, se han relacionado múltiples significados con el término, lo que resulta en confusión. Revisamos referencias a la estrategia ambiental de 1957 a 2012 e identificamos tres usos principales: como una alternativa para manejo ambiental o basado en ecosistemas; en referencia a una estrategia integrada y equitativa para el manejo de recursos según la CBD; y como un término que indica un enfoque en el entendimiento y la valuación de los servicios ambientales. Aunque los usos de este término y sus variantes pueden traslaparse en su significado, típicamente no reflejan en su totalidad los valores de la estrategia ambiental como fue definida por la CBD. Por ejemplo, actualmente hay un énfasis creciente en los servicios ambientales, pero enfocarse solamente en estos no promueve la descentralización del manejo o el uso de todas las formas de conocimiento, siendo ambas integrales para el concepto de la CBD. Resaltamos que los Principios de Malawi están en riesgo de ser olvidados. Para entender mejor estos principios, se requiere de más esfuerzo para implementarlos. Dichos esfuerzos deben ser evaluados, idóneamente con estrategias comparativas, antes de permitir que el concepto de la CBD de manejo holístico y comprometido socialmente sea abandonado o reemplazado. Es posible que los intentos por implementar los 12 principios juntos enfrentarán muchos obstáculos, pero también pueden ofrecer una forma única de promover el gobierno holístico y equitativo de los recursos naturales. Así, creemos que el concepto de estrategia ambiental de la CBD exige mayor atención.

Highlights

  • In 2000, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted as their primary framework for action the “ecosystem approach” (EA) and defined it as “a strategy for the integrated management of land, water, and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way” (CBD SBSTTA 2000)

  • Because the recent Rio+20 meeting of the CBD raised questions about the extent to which high-level international agreements can influence environmental governance and the outcomes for natural resource management (Tollefson & Gilbert 2012), it is worth reflecting on the use and influence of its primary framework for action so as to inform the debate

  • By the time of the CBD’s second Conference of Parties (COP), the EA had been explicitly adopted as its primary framework to promote conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity in relation to ecosystem function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2000, parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) adopted as their primary framework for action the “ecosystem approach” (EA) and defined it as “a strategy for the integrated management of land, water, and living resources that promotes conservation and sustainable use in an equitable way” (CBD SBSTTA 2000). The term has become increasingly popular, but its use is not always associated with the CBD’s definition. Instead, it is linked with various initiatives relating to understanding or managing natural resources. Because the CBD’s concept was ambitious and was presented as the key framework for enabling sustainable and equitable resource management, it is important to understand better how the term ecosystem approach is used and if its use reflects progress in understanding and implementing natural resource management. Because the recent Rio+20 meeting of the CBD raised questions about the extent to which high-level international agreements can influence environmental governance and the outcomes for natural resource management (Tollefson & Gilbert 2012), it is worth reflecting on the use and influence of its primary framework for action so as to inform the debate

Exploring Use of Ecosystem Approach over Time
Links between the Malawi Principles and Other Conservation Concepts
Principle description
Potential Challenges to Implementation of the Malawi Principles
Progress in Implementing the Malawi Principles
Moves toward an ESA
Role of different stakeholders and their different knowledges
Scale of work
Implications for Natural Resource Management
Evaluating and Understanding the Malawi Principles
Findings
Literature Cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call