Abstract

Introduction The ICRMW, and the reluctance of some states to ratify it, symbolizes sharpening clashes between the conditions of globalization and a rights-based approach to governance. The question of migrants' rights represents a cutting edge of contention between the consequences of the economic logic of globalization vs the moral values embodied in human rights concepts and law. This contention is marked most dramatically by the conditions that many migrant workers face in host countries around the world. As the 2004 International Labour Conference observed: Despite the positive experiences of migrant workers, a significant number face undue hardships and abuse in the form of low wages, poor working conditions, virtual absence of social protection, denial of freedom of association and workers' rights, discrimination and xenophobia, as well as social exclusion. Gaps in working conditions, wages and treatment exist among migrant workers and between migrant and national workers. In a significant number of cases, unemployment rates, job security and wages differ between regular migrant workers and national workers (ILO, 2004). Widespread abuse and exploitation of migrant workers – often described in terms of forced labour and slavery-like situations – stand in marked contrast to the promises that economic globalization will bring better conditions and social protection to the lives of people around the world. With increasing competition for resources, markets and capital, downward pressures on incomes and conditions of work appear to be generalized across industrialized countries as well as elsewhere.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call