Abstract

Young biomedical PhD scientists are needed in a wide variety of careers. Many recent efforts have been focused on revising training approaches to help them choose and prepare for different careers. However, very little is known about how biomedical PhD students decide on and “differentiate” into careers, which limits the development of new training models. This knowledge gap also severely limits efforts to increase the representation of women and some racial/ethnic groups in academic research careers. Previous studies have used cross-sectional surveys of career interests and ratings, and have not been designed to identify career intentions. They also are limited by single-time data and response bias, having typically asked participants to recount decisions made years in the past. This report draws on annual, in-depth interviews with 147 biomedical PhD students from the start of the PhD to graduation. Qualitative content analysis methods were used to fully understand scientific development and career intentions over time. Longitudinal analysis reveals a striking level of fluidity and complexity in career intentions over time. Contrary to previous studies and the dominant narrative, data do not show generalized shifts away from academic careers. In addition to those who are consistent in this intention from the start, nearly as many students shift toward research academic careers as away from them, and only modest differences exist by gender and race/ethnicity. Thus, the dominant narrative misses the high fraction of individuals who acquire or sustain their intention to purse an academic research career during training. Efforts to increase diversity in academia must capitalize on and support those who are still considering and evolve toward an academic career. Efforts to revise research training should incorporate knowledge of the tremendous fluidity in when and how career differentiation occurs.

Highlights

  • For more than 30 years, the biomedical research and training communities have faced two major concerns: 1) how to prepare PhD students and postdocs for changing and expanding career roles; and 2) the low levels of gender and racial/ethnic diversity across the workforce, but in academic careers

  • These two challenges are in many ways distinct, and much time and effort has been devoted to addressing them separately. Solutions to both have been hampered by a knowledge gap—the absence of in-depth, prospective data on the processes of how biomedical trainees “differentiate” into their chosen careers. This gap is problematic because the U.S commits a great deal of financial and human resources to train new PhD scientists as science careers evolve and to increase the number of women and historically underrepresented individuals (UR) in academic careers

  • In the 1990s, a vigorous national debate emerged on whether the U.S was producing too many biomedical PhDs as the number of faculty positions was declining relative to the number of new PhD scientists [1]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

For more than 30 years, the biomedical research and training communities have faced two major concerns: 1) how to prepare PhD students and postdocs for changing and expanding career roles; and 2) the low levels of gender and racial/ethnic diversity across the workforce, but in academic careers These two challenges are in many ways distinct, and much time and effort has been devoted to addressing them separately. National-level studies and reports have led to proposed changes in PhD training designs to prepare graduates for a variety of careers [4,5,6], and universities have dedicated resources to career development for multiple roles in science [7] This “branching” career model has been largely accepted within the biomedical training community [8]. Precise and real-time knowledge of these decisions is necessary to understand how and when to offer guidance for career development and selection

Methods
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call