Abstract

BackgroundGene Set Analysis (GSA) identifies differential expression gene sets amid the different phenotypes. The results of published papers in this filed are inconsistent and there is no consensus on the best method. In this paper two new methods, in comparison to the previous ones, are introduced for GSA. MethodsThe MMGSA and MRGSA methods based on multivariate nonparametric techniques were presented. The implementation of five GSA methods (Hotelling's T2, Globaltest, Abs_Cat, Med_Cat and Rs_Cat) and the novel methods to detect differential gene expression between phenotypes were compared using simulated and real microarray data sets. ResultsIn a real dataset, the results showed that the powers of MMGSA and MRGSA were as well as Globaltest and Tsai. The MRGSA method has not a good performance in the simulation dataset. ConclusionsThe Globaltest method is the best method in the real or simulation datasets. The performance of MMGSA in simulation dataset is good in small-size gene sets. The GLS methods are not good in the simulated data, except the Med_Cat method in large-size gene sets.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.