Abstract

Many factors and theories of motivation apply broadly to workers regardless of profession. The prior research has shown that engineers and knowledge workers are highly motivated by intrinsic and non-monetary factors such as challenging work, recognition for good results, and the opportunity for professional growth. Therefore, the nature of their assigned tasks and their ability to complete their work in an efficient and robust way are highly related to motivation. Product Development Engineers (PDEs) play a crucial role in creating value and revenue for companies via the development of useful new products for customers. It is, however, a general observation that PDEs in automotive companies, especially at original equipment manufacturer, OEM, levels, often have minimal or no interaction with the end customer. With the advent of hybrid, electric, and autonomous vehicles, PDE working in the automotive industry, APDEs, has seen a shift in their role and responsibilities from traditional automotive PDEs. APDEs mostly receive customer input indirectly from management or through a marketing organization. This is in contrast to other professionals such as doctors, lawyers, and architects who frequently interact directly with their customers. 
 This paper presents the finding of qualitative research, examining the relationship between APDEs interaction with customers, and achieving clear customer inputs. The paper investigates differences among various types of APDEs and seeks further insights as to the motivational impact of customer inputs on automotive PDEs. It also probes the question if there are any differences among various types of automotive PDEs when it comes to motivation. The paper concludes that, for some types of APDEs, the lack of customer interaction is a motivational disadvantage while for the others it is not. It also concludes that further research needs to be conducted in order to find the reasons for such discrepancies.

Highlights

  • Research on motivation and the differences and similarities for engineers vs. other professionals supports a general conclusion that engineers are more highly motivated by intrinsic rather vs. extrinsic factors [1], [2], [3]

  • These Automotive Product Development Engineers (PDEs) can be divided into two distinctive categories, those working on artificial intelligence (AI),hardware/software, embedded system, etc. let’s call them AI/Software PDES or ASPDEs and all other PDEs working in the traditional design and manufacturing environment, known as Design and Manufacturing PDEs or DMPDEs

  • This paper will provide a literature review of the current related research and uses a descriptive research methodology to investigate, if there is any difference between automotive PDEs and other professionals on how they get motivated towards the development of new product, by theorizing that the lack of customer interaction among automotive PDEs results in frustration that affects their motivation

Read more

Summary

Product Development Engineers at a Disadvantage?

John Weisgerber Graduate Student, Engineering Management; School of Engineering Eastern Michigan University.

INTRODUCTION
LITERATURE REVIEW
DATA ANALYSIS
Alpha on Standardized Items
SE Mean
Regression Equation
Coef Value Value
Value Value
Findings
Term Coef
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call