Abstract

Little is known about how mutualistic interactions affect the distribution of species richness on broad geographic scales. Because mutualism positively affects the fitness of all species involved in the interaction, one hypothesis is that the richness of species involved should be positively correlated across their range, especially for obligate relationships. Alternatively, if mutualisms involve multiple mutualistic partners, the distribution of mutualists should not necessarily be related, and patterns in species distributions might be more strongly correlated with environmental factors. In this study, we compared the distributions of plants and vertebrate animals involved in seed‐dispersal mutualisms across the United States and Canada. We compiled geographic distributions of plants dispersed by frugivores and scatter‐hoarding animals, and compared their distribution of richness to the distribution in disperser richness. We found that the distribution of animal dispersers shows a negative relationship to the distribution of the plants that they disperse, and this is true whether the plants dispersed by frugivores or scatter‐hoarders are considered separately or combined. In fact, the mismatch in species richness between plants and the animals that disperse their seeds is dramatic, with plants species richness greatest in the in the eastern United States and the animal species richness greatest in the southwest United States. Environmental factors were corelated with the difference in the distribution of plants and their animal mutualists and likely are more important in the distribution of both plants and animals. This study is the first to describe the broad‐scale distribution of seed‐dispersing vertebrates and compare the distributions to the plants they disperse. With these data, we can now identify locations that warrant further study to understand the factors that influence the distribution of the plants and animals involved in these mutualisms.

Highlights

  • The broadest spatial scale of ecology examines patterns of diversity based on the 39 geographic distributions of species (MacArthur 1972)

  • We identified 183 animal species in North America that have a seed dispersing

  • The primary split in the classifications and regression trees (CART) model for all 224 mutualists was at ~50oN latitude

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The broadest spatial scale of ecology examines patterns of diversity based on the 39 geographic distributions of species (MacArthur 1972). Geographic distributions of 40 species are important (i) to infer lower-level community-, population-, and physiological-. There is a 43 preponderance of studies of species richness at broad geographic scales (Oberdoff et al.44 1995; Rahbek & Graves 2001; Hawkins et al 2003a; Rahbek et al 2007) that have 45 facilitated our understanding of why species are found where they are, a central tenet. 47 distributions are compared with environmental variables, which are presumed. of species' distributions, ; the other determinant—species interactions—is a key, understudied determinant of species' distributions. When species or guilds interact, we expect the geographic distributions of the 52 pairs to be correlated. For pairwise interaction types where a species or guild benefits

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call