Abstract

The paper evaluates the convergence paths of Central and Eastern European member states of the EU during the 2010s, when the main task for these countries was avoiding the middle-income trap—when wages are not so low anymore to compete with less developed countries, while innovation is not developed enough yet to compete with developed countries. Using various statistical indicators, the paper shows that while most countries in the region have been on a convergence path during the decade under analysis, not all succeeded in avoiding the trap. While some countries successfully implemented policies to step on the path of productivity- and innovation-led growth (Czechia, Slovenia, Estonia, and Lithuania), in several other states, growth was supported mainly by low costs and loose monetary conditions including significant transfers from the EU. The comparative analysis of Estonia and Hungary illustrates the different growth models and shows how the institutional system plays a key role in exiting the trap.

Highlights

  • The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic crisis ended a decade-long period of growth around the world and the Central and Eastern European (CEE)region, which warrants taking stock

  • This study provides an overview of the developmental paths of the 11 Central and Eastern European Member States during the

  • Two Baltic States (Lithuania and Estonia) and Czechia performed the best as they closed over 50% of their development gap during the past decade

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic and the ensuing economic crisis ended a decade-long period of growth around the world and the Central and Eastern European (CEE).

What were the main characteristics of convergence in the region
Objectives
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call