Abstract
Quantifying the oxidation state of multivalent elements in silicate melts (e.g., Fe2+ versus Fe3+ or S2- versus S6+) is fundamental for constraining oxygen fugacity. Oxygen fugacity is a key thermodynamic parameter in understanding melt chemical history from the Earth’s mantle through the crust to the surface. To make these measurements, analyses are typically performed on small (<100 µm diameter) regions of quenched volcanic melt (now silicate glass) forming the matrix between crystals or as trapped inclusions. Such small volumes require microanalysis, with multiple techniques often applied to the same area of glass to extract the full range of information that will shed light on volcanic and magmatic processes. This can be problematic as silicate glasses are often unstable under the electron and photon beams used for this range of analyses. It is therefore important to understand any compositional and structural changes induced within the silicate glass during analysis, not only to ensure accurate measurements (and interpretations), but also that subsequent analyses are not compromised. Here, we review techniques commonly used for measuring the Fe and S oxidation state in silicate glass and explain how silicate glass of different compositions responds to electron and photon beam irradiation.
Highlights
Magmas are a complex and evolving mix of bubbles, crystals, and melt, where the abundance and composition of these phases changes significantly during ascent
We review techniques commonly used for measuring the Fe and S oxidation state in silicate glass and explain how silicate glass of different compositions responds to electron and photon beam irradiation
The rate and direction of redox change depends on the primary beam conditions and measurement time, and on glass composition (e.g., Si, Fe, and H2O)
Summary
Magmas are a complex and evolving mix of bubbles, crystals, and melt, where the abundance and composition of these phases changes significantly during ascent. Cottrell et al [49] investigated beam damage to hydrous basaltic glass (Fig. 8b) They observed that during analysis the Fe3+ multiplet increases in intensity, the Fe2+ multiplet decreases, and the white line shifts to higher energy, which implies oxidation of Fe2+ to Fe3+ rather than increased 3d-4p hybridisation. Oxidised glass reduces over time and S4- is observed, where the rate is controlled by the beam conditions and increases with H2O present, whereas partially or completely reduced samples do not change oxidation state [17, 33]. Initially oxidised samples have a thinner oxidised layer as there is less driving force for oxidation [19]
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.