Abstract

In this study, the current Met Office operational land surface data assimilation system used to produce soil moisture analyses is presented. The main aim of including Land Surface Data Assimilation (LSDA) in both the global and regional systems is to improve forecasts of surface air temperature and humidity. Results from trials assimilating pseudo-observations of 1.5 m air temperature and specific humidity and satellite-derived soil wetness (ASCAT) observations are analysed. The pre-processing of all the observations is described, including the definition and construction of the pseudo-observations. The benefits of using both observations together to produce improved forecasts of surface air temperature and humidity are outlined both in the winter and summer seasons. The benefits of using active LSDA are quantified by the root mean squared error, which is computed using both surface observations and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analyses as truth. For the global model trials, results are presented separately for the Northern (NH) and Southern (SH) hemispheres. When compared against ground-truth, LSDA in winter NH appears neutral, but in the SH it is the assimilation of ASCAT that contributes to approximately a 2% improvement in temperatures at lead times beyond 48 h. In NH summer, the ASCAT soil wetness observations degrade the forecasts against observations by about 1%, but including the screen level pseudo-observations provides a compensating benefit. In contrast, in the SH, the positive effect comes from including the ASCAT soil wetness observations, and when both observations types are assimilated there is a compensating effect. Finally, we demonstrate substantial improvements to hydrological prediction when using land surface data assimilation in the regional model. Using the Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE) metric as an aggregated measure of river flow simulation skill relative to observations, we find that NSE was improved at 106 of 143 UK river gauge locations considered after LSDA was introduced. The number of gauge comparisons where NSE exceeded 0.5 is also increased from 17 to 28 with LSDA.

Highlights

  • The Met Office assimilates observations of the land surface in order to improve the set of initial conditions for numerical weather prediction (NWP)

  • By comparing the Met Office forecasts over the course of a winter season with both observations and an independent analysis of the 1.5 m air temperature fields, we conclude that the Land Surface Data Assimilation (LSDA)-S, LSDA-A, and LSDA-O experiments show a neutral to positive impact in both hemispheres

  • There are small, but negative, results in root mean squared error (RMSE) when compared against the SYNOP observations and the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) analyses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Met Office assimilates observations of the land surface in order to improve the set of initial conditions for numerical weather prediction (NWP). The expected benefit to NWP of including land surface information by assimilation of soil moisture observations is in the improvements to forecasts of the screen level or near-surface air temperature and humidity [1]. Evaporation of moisture from the soil itself and transpiration from vegetation affect how energy is partitioned between the two heat fluxes. It follows that the accurate initial soil moisture state will produce more accurate estimates of the air temperature and humidity near the surface [2,3]. We focus on soil moisture only, and not, e.g., on snow cover or soil temperature, which are important components of the land surface system

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call