Abstract

A new two-terminal mechanical element named the mem-inerter described by a relation between integrated momentum and displacement is introduced as the memory counterpart of an inerter. It exhibits an individual “fingermark” featured by a pinched hysteresis loop located within the momentum-velocity plane. The mem-inerter is attached to a simple mass-spring-damper system. The system equipped with a mem-inerter is mathematically modeled, and its nonlinear vibration equation is derived. To ensure a fair performance comparison between the systems equipped with the mem-inerter and the inerter, the nonlinear mem-inerter with an appropriate helix pitch can be proved to be equivalent to the linear inerter with a fixed inertance by the fact that the systems have the same displacement transmissibility for forced response. Under such a premise, it is found that the system with the mem-inerter having positive initial displacement has better performance for free response than the system with the inerter. Furthermore, the application scenario that both systems are arranged on an inclined plane is taken as an example of the positive initial displacement. The example demonstrates that the system with the mem-inerter has significantly better transient performance than the system with the inerter.

Highlights

  • In 2002, a new ideal mechanical element named the inerter was proposed by Smith.[1]

  • Some simulation results show that the device presents pinched hysteresis loops which have been accepted as the fingermarks of memory circuit elements in the electrical domain.[12,15]

  • A new ideal mechanical element called the mem-inerter was proposed as the memory counterpart of an inerter and arrangeÐd in an element class linking integrated momentum p and displacement x at the triangular periodic table of elementary mechanical elements

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 2002, a new ideal mechanical element named the inerter was proposed by Smith.[1]. With two independently movable terminals, the inerter has the nature that the acting force on the terminals is directly proportional to the relative acceleration between them.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call