Abstract
The interim payment system (IPS) for Medicare home health services, enacted in the Balanced Budget Act of 1997, was intended to slow the growth of home health expenses until HCFA could design a new prospective system. Instead, the IPS has acted like a per-case payment system without case-mix adjustment. Its impact on agencies, along with other policy pressures, has been first to slow and then to reverse the dramatic expansion of the home health sector. In this paper, we identify the impetus for payment changes in the recent history of the Medicare home health benefit. We then present emerging evidence about the effects of IPS and other recent policies on home health. Finally, we draw several lessons from this experience for the impending prospective payment system.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
